Mercadona Tech
Brought their commerce stack in-house with a custom internal platform
Adjacent playbook — they describe the same trade-off your roadmap implies, with public posts on what they kept vs. rebuilt.
Source: mercadonatech.com
What I read about you
The Senior Platform JD names 'agentic onboarding' as the 2026 wedge — same pattern I shipped end-to-end at my last role.
Source: careers
Three of your last four engineering posts cover Langfuse-style tracing for model calls — already part of my default stack.
Source: engineering blog
Public GitHub org has 8 Python repos, all CrewAI-adjacent — the same primitives I run on a 30-service home lab.
Source: github.com/example-helio
Your CTO's recent talk on 'agents as composable internal tools' maps almost 1:1 to my MCP-based platform design.
Source: talk video
The threat nobody is pricing in
In the next 12 months, a single engineer with the right agent stack will out-iterate most product teams. The companies that survive aren't the biggest — they're the ones whose know-how is documented (so it can be reshaped at speed) and whose infrastructure is agent-ready (so pivots take days, not quarters). I help you build both quietly, in parallel with the shipping you already have to do — that's the differentiator most candidates won't even name.
Document the know-how
Agent-driven processes that capture decisions, runbooks, and tribal knowledge as they happen — not a quarterly Confluence audit.
Make infra agent-ready
MCP servers + composable internal tools so when the next pivot lands, the agent loop is one prompt away, not one rebuild.
In parallel with shipping
Both happen alongside the roadmap you already have. No 6-month transformation programme; the artefacts compound from week one.
Who's already moving this way in your space
Your careers page calls 'agentic onboarding' the 2026 wedge. Below are three peer-tier teams with public work in adjacent territory — reference points, not direct equivalents.
Mercadona Tech
Brought their commerce stack in-house with a custom internal platform
Adjacent playbook — they describe the same trade-off your roadmap implies, with public posts on what they kept vs. rebuilt.
Source: mercadonatech.com
Glovo
Engineering team published on agent-assisted on-call and incident triage
Spanish peer, comparable stage — useful as a reference point for the kind of internal-tooling posture that scales without a big team.
Source: medium.com/glovo-engineering
Salesforce
Public moves toward agent-driven internal dev in their CRM platform work
Different scale, but signals that even incumbents are openly rebuilding around agent loops — i.e. it's not just startup talk.
Source: salesforce.com
I've worked on adjacent patterns in past roles — happy to walk through what carries over and what doesn't on a call.
What I'd do in your first ~90 days
First wedge would be replacing your manual onboarding runbook with a CrewAI flow — the JD calls this out and I shipped the same pattern at a fintech SaaS, going from a 40-step Confluence page to a 4-hour automated loop. Once that's live, the next move is wiring Langfuse-style tracing across your existing model calls so PMs can defend roadmap decisions with cost + quality data instead of vibes. The third move is the one most candidates won't propose: pick the highest-friction support flow and rebuild it as an agent that handles 70% end-to-end with a clean human handoff for the rest. The pattern, not the feature, is what compounds.
Why speed-to-prod is the wedge
Most teams stall because no single person owns infra → data → app → agent loop. The pattern that ships in weeks is one engineer who can stand up the platform, wire the orchestration, and put a working feature in front of users without a six-week planning cycle. I run 30+ self-hosted services on a 2-node home lab and the same generic 4-crew agent platform that produced the page you're reading. Hiring me skips the months your peers spent finding out the hard way.
Closest match in my portfolio
Same shape as the 2026 reliability + observability work in your JD — a platform with debt, no dedicated owner, and a need to defend roadmap with real data.
De facto tech lead. Owned infra, ingestion, orchestration, warehouse end-to-end. Led the Redshift→Snowflake migration; took daily failures to near-zero unforced errors.
If after a 15-minute call it isn't the right fit, no pressure — and you keep the analysis I already wrote.
Fidel Perez · Senior Data Engineer · AI-First · 11+ yrs